NIA questions Integrity Commission’s handling of PM’s conflict of interest report
Mentioned
Analysis
The article describes oversight and accountability concerns regarding the Integrity Commission’s handling of a Prime Minister’s alleged conflict of interest and the process/timing of reporting and referrals for potential corruption prosecution. It includes specific watchdog scrutiny and procedural questions tied to corruption governance.
Full Article
The National Integrity Action (NIA) is raising questions about the Integrity Commission’s handling of the findings in relation to conflict of interest allegations against Prime Minister Andrew Holness.
Noting that an official statement by the Integrity Commission on Friday clarifies certain issues – including “the negative impact in this case of the ‘gag clause’ in prohibiting simultaneous release of the Director of Corruption Prosecutions’ (DCP) ruling and the Director of Investigation’s referral of ‘potential conflict of interest’ by the PM for prosecution” – the NIA said there are critical outstanding questions that its fellow corruption watchdog needs to address “as a matter of urgency”.
The NIA said two of these “outstanding” questions are specifically:
– Why is it that the Director of Investigation’s Report, dated October 22, 2022, referring matters relating to the PMs ‘potential conflict of interest’ to the DCP for a ruling was only ‘sent to Parliament and was tabled on February 14th ’; fully 17 weeks and 3 days after completion?
– Why is it that the commissioners took over four weeks ‘to read, understand and discuss’ and finalise its ‘review’ of the 14-page document containing the findings and ruling of the director of corruption prosecution that ‘no charges be brought in support of the allegations made’ including in relation to the prime minister?
The NIA went on to urge the Integrity Commission to hold a press briefing where these and other questions arising from their official statement can be answered.
“In the light of the likelihood that public confidence in the Integrity Commission has been shaken and the actual damage to the reputation of the PM, the Office of the Prime Minister and to Jamaica, NIA urges the IC to urgently convene a press briefing. This would allow officers of the IC to respond to these and other questions arising from its ‘Official Statement’,” the NIA said.
The Integrity Commission on Friday rejected allegations of misstep in its decision to table a report in Parliament which stated that the prime minister could face corruption charges, while being aware that its director of corruption prosecution had ruled that he should not be charged.
They pointed to the Integrity Commission Act which requires that where, in a report to the commission, the director of investigation is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that there has been a breach of a code of conduct by a public officer or parliamentarian, or where there is suspicion that an act of corruption or an offence under the Act has been committed, the commission shall submit the report to Parliament for tabling.
READ:‘We did nothing wrong’ Under-fire Integrity Commission defends its handling of allegations against PM
Related Articles
‘We did nothing wrong’
THE Integrity Commission has rejected allegations of misstep, if not bungling, in its decision to table a report in Parliament which stated that Prime Minister Andrew Holness could face corruption charges, while being aware that its director of corruption prosecution had ruled that he should not be charged. With commentators and the general public slating the body since news broke on Thursday that it had allowed the tabling of a report from its director of investigation accusing Holness of a possible conflict of interest over contracts issued to a friend of his, more than a decade ago, while being aware that he had been cleared, the five directors of the Integrity Commission on Friday fired back.…
‘Witch-hunt’
THE Integrity Commission has turned its spotlight on some of Jamaica’s most senior civil servants, some with decades of service, sending shock waves throughout the leadership of the island’s public sector. TheJamaica Observerhas confirmed that Craig Beresford, director of information and complaints at the Integrity Commission, has written to at least eight permanent secretaries and a number of other senior civil servants indicating that an enquiry into their statutory declarations for 2019 will be subject to an extensive examination, starting next week.…
NO CHARGES
The Integrity Commission’s director of corruption prosecution has ruled that no charges are to be brought against Prime Minister Andrew Holness in relation to a conflict of interest accusation levelled at him over two contracts awarded to a company owned by a friend of his 14 years ago when he was education minister. A similar ruling was made in relation to the National Works Agency (NWA), Ministry of Education, and the Social Development Commission (SDC) pertaining to breaches of the public sector procurement regulations committed between 2006 and 2009.…
‘I did no wrong’
PRIMEMinister Andrew Holness last night rejected the Integrity Commission’s suggestion of conflict of interest on his part in the awarding of contracts to a company owned by a friend of his, 14 years ago when he was education minister, and said he will do all in his power “to ensure that the truth is known”. Holness was responding to the commission’s report tabled in Parliament on Tuesday referring him to the director of corruption prosecution for “consideration with respect to breaches of the Contractor General Act” in relation to contracts awarded to Westcon Construction Limited between February 2007 and November 2009.…